Pre-reg note: accuracy-by-field (narrated pass) evals
2026-08-08 ~11:2xZ. Record-only diagnostic (the microbench
precedent). Queue item fieldgen-accuracy-eval (owner steering
2026-08-08 10:08Z: “We should also run the eval script with field
generation enabled, reports have a table with accuracy by field which
would also be good to see”). Posted BEFORE the one GPU run it
registers.
A correction first — the AR-100k half is already banked
My 10:49Z in-channel answer said the banked panel runs didn’t enable
field generation. That was wrong for AR-100k. The narrated pass
(bijou@100000+fields — the model decodes every trained aux field,
then its actions) rides automatically on aux-trained checkpoints,
and the banked AR-100k greedy panel has carried the accuracy-by-field
block all along
(report):
| field | metric | value | frames |
|---|---|---|---|
| holding | accuracy | 0.807 | 8,987 |
| progress | MAE | 0.062 | 8,987 |
| event | presence accuracy | 0.878 | 8,987 |
| visible | slot-set accuracy | 0.319 | 8,260 |
Caveats that travel with the table: labels are the weak judge’s
(~80% inter-judge holding agreement, ±15% progress MAE — ceilings sit
near the label noise); event scores presence (“none” vs any), visible
scores exact set-equality of parsed slots (the 0.319 is the strictest
metric here, not comparable across columns). Free companion read:
narration costs on AR-100k — +fields chunk MAE 5.8565 vs base
5.8026 (+0.054, the known does-narration-help sign at 100k).
Consequence: no AR-100k GPU run. The queued ~1–2 GPU-h local run is cancelled as redundant — the table above is the deliverable.
Why molmo2 has no table — a found-and-fixed bug
The molmo2 40k panel shows all-None accuracies next to 8,596 labeled
frames. Root cause (fixed in 2f4d575, regression-tested):
BijouPolicy gated the narrated pass on the Gemma concrete
(isinstance(decoder, ARBackboneDecoder)); Molmo2ARDecoder is a
sibling concrete of the shared ARSuffixDecoder scaffold, so
aux-trained molmo2 checkpoints silently reported no trained fields
and the pass never rode. Prompt bytes are unchanged by the fix on
every banked read (molmo2 checkpoints record generate_bracket=True;
the request renders identically) — banked numbers all stand; the only
behavior change is that the narrated arm now exists on molmo2.
The one run this note registers
fontaine_molmo2_ar_60k_ddp4 @60k fields panel (box 4×DDP), via
fontaine/scripts/box/eval_box_molmo2_60k_fields_panel.sh +
run_detached.sh, strictly AFTER:
- the 60k endpoint saves and its chained panel eval lands (tonight’s chain runs the box checkout as launched — charter: never sync box code under a live run — so the chained eval stays narrated-arm-free and byte-comparable to the 40k panel, which is what the paired 60k-vs-40k read wants anyway), and
- the box control checkout is refreshed via
refresh_ctrl.shto a commit carrying2f4d575(the launcher greps the fixed gate inbijou/eval/policies.pyand refuses to run pre-fix code).
Exact command = the chained eval’s, byte-identical flags/plan/seed,
output stems ..._panel_curated_v0_k4l2_fields. No new CLI flags:
post-fix the narrated pass rides automatically.
Frozen reads (all record-only):
- The accuracy-by-field table for molmo2@60k — same four metrics as above, same weak-label caveats. This is the owner deliverable.
- Does-narration-help on molmo2:
+fieldsvsbijou@60000paired chunk MAE (AR-100k anchor: +0.054 cost). Record-only — no decision hangs on it. - Validity oracle, checked mechanically by the launcher: the
fields run’s base
bijou@60000chunk MAE must equal the chained eval’s to full JSON precision (same instrument, same 4-rank sharding, greedy decode — the index-sorted merge is world-size-invariant). Disagreement = instrument finding, abort the read.
Cost: base + narrated ≈ 2× the 40k chained panel (~1.7 GPU-h) ⇒ ~3.5 GPU-h, gate 6 GPU-h — inside the box window after the 60k chain, before the attach screen opens (the attach decision consumes the 60k-vs-40k read, not this diagnostic).
Not registered here: any 40k-side narrated run (superseded — the 60k trunk is the continuation the board tracks), any headline claim from field accuracies (weak labels), any re-run of the AR-100k table.